Dip into the archive and check out our other exponent mistakes. What do you notice?
Thanks to Julie for the submission!
Dip into the archive and check out our other exponent mistakes. What do you notice?
Thanks to Julie for the submission!
Question: Evaluate the expression when
, $latex y = -2$, and $latex z = -2$.
These submissions come from Julie, who posted about this stuff on her blog:
What happened? First, I HATE PEMDAS AND ANYONE WHO USES IT. This starts early, and students are already brainwashed by 6th grade when I get them. All of the GEMS in the world can’t seem to fix this. I hate PEMDAS because students see parenthesis and go into “I must do that first” mode, even when there is only ONE number inside the parenthesis. Just because it is in parenthesis, one number, for example (2), does NOT a group make.
Discuss her evaluation of the problem, and her next steps, either in the comments or at her place.
Chris Shore passes on the above, and he thinks that things just aren’t clicking for this kid. I’m inclined to agree. What would you all recommend? What’s the next step for this kid?
We actually have an explanation from the student, and hopefully Alison Royster will be kind enough to jump in on the comments and provide it.
What does the kid think the distributive property is?
It’s easy to say: “Well, I’d avoid this mistake in my class by teaching the distributive property correctly.” Well, what’s the wrong way to teach this thing, then? What’s the smartest possible way to teach this, and still end up with your kids making that mistake?
After you’re done writing an awesome comment to this post, go check out Josh Weisenfeld’s blog. He spotted and submitted this gem of a mistake.