How would you simplify ? It’s not the same, because multiplying by complex conjugate doesn’t get rid of the x in the denominator. I think is a different fish from
Also, the multiplication of the two binomials is a math mistake in its own right. Two for one, thanks!
sorry, no idea why that peculiar symbol is there, please ignore it. Just a LaTex learner.
Via Colleen, who commented on the picture on a different page: “This student assumes that (a+b)/(c+d) = a/b+b/d. We could show him that this doesn’t work with numbers?”
I agree with Colleen that we could use specific numbers to show (a+b)/(c+d) != a/c + b/d. However, that never sticks. How do we permanently knock this misunderstanding out of students minds?
4 replies on “Complex Division”
How would you simplify
? It’s not the same, because multiplying by complex conjugate doesn’t get rid of the x in the denominator. I think
is a different fish from ![\left( x\right) ^{2}](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cleft%28+x%5Cright%29+%5E%7B2%7D+&bg=ffffff&fg=000&s=0&c=20201002)
Also, the multiplication of the two binomials is a math mistake in its own right. Two for one, thanks!
sorry, no idea why that peculiar symbol is there, please ignore it. Just a LaTex learner.
Via Colleen, who commented on the picture on a different page: “This student assumes that (a+b)/(c+d) = a/b+b/d. We could show him that this doesn’t work with numbers?”
I agree with Colleen that we could use specific numbers to show (a+b)/(c+d) != a/c + b/d. However, that never sticks. How do we permanently knock this misunderstanding out of students minds?