https://twitter.com/MTChirps/status/390185033631137793/
https://twitter.com/MTChirps/status/390201190085971968
https://twitter.com/daveinstpaul/status/390198645884088321
@mpershan @MTChirps @MrPoliquin But rules of implication may be at heart of the error rather than knowledge of angles. And maybe guessing.
— Christopher Danielson (@Trianglemancsd) October 15, 2013
@MTChirps Does she know that the converse often doesn't follow from the conditional? Maybe she thinks the converse is always trouble.
— Michael Pershan (@mpershan) October 15, 2013
Your thoughts?